Cases 21 - 30 of 420,970
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FUREY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv05770
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FUREY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOES (1-10) and ABC CORPS (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Johns v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Alvie Johns
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mantel v. Remolacha LLC
as 1:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Defendant:
Remolacha LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
