Cases 1 - 10 of 21,655
Johnson et al v. The University of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brayden Johnson, Logan Rhines and Kayla Savage
Defendant:
The University of Oklahoma, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Jeff Blahnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Paul Butakov v. Case Management of USC et al
as 2:2024cv03967
Plaintiff:
Paul Butakov
Defendant:
Case Management of USC, Andreas Mause, Maxwell Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Chakotay Johnson v. Mark Zuckerberg
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook Meta; Facebook.com
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Tiff's Treats Holding, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jade Johnson
Defendant:
Tiff's Treats Holding, Inc., Tiff's Treats GP LLC, Tiff's Treats LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Zerfas
as 1:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Trevor Johnson
Defendant:
Madison Zerfas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
