Cases 1 - 10 of 577
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gould et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Kane v. Sunset Park MGMT Properties LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02196
Plaintiff:
Nickie Kane
Defendant:
Sunset Park MGMT Properties LLC and Sterling Group Developers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brodsky v. Dun et al
as 1:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Brodsky
Defendant:
Kat Dun, Nicole Gold, Watermark Apartments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
