Cases 1 - 10 of 351
SCHILLING v. MACDONALD et al
as 2:2024cv06680
Plaintiff:
MIKE SCHILLING
Defendant:
GUY MACDONALD, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C. GILMAN and others
Doll v. City of Trenton et al
as 2:2024cv11467
Plaintiff:
Edward Doll
Defendant:
City of Trenton, Blake Rusnak, Evan MacLeod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
DAVIS v. ANGULO et al
as 2:2024cv05774
Plaintiff:
RUSKIN DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID ANGULO, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C GILMAN and others
Jane Doe v. Richard Macleod, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MARGARET BURKE, TODD SEXTON and RICHARD MACLEOD
Hoipkemier et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Adam Hoipkemier and Kevin Epps
Defendant:
Duane V. Miller, Eric Macleod, Oak Ridge Project Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. et al
as 3:2024cv04564
Plaintiff:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV
Defendant:
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. and MACLEODS PHARMA USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Marcus Brent Fields v. Jeffery Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
Jeffery Macomber, Warden Samuel, A. Macleod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacLeod v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
April MacLeod
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
