Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Koh et al v. Koo et al
as 1:2022cv06639
Plaintiff:
Sean Koh and Koherent, Inc.
Defendant:
Bonwoong (Brian) Koo, Maum Holdings, Inc. and Maum Capital Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Scavone v. Koenigsmann et al
as 1:2018cv10318
Defendant:
Joseph Alvanzaro, Angela Maume and Carl Koenigsmann
Plaintiff:
Louis Scavone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahon v. Annucci et al
as 1:2018cv06508
Defendant:
Dep'ty Superint D. Maume and Anthony Annucci
Plaintiff:
Kalonji Mahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn v. Montgomery
as 18-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Osborn
Defendant - Appellee:
Sergeant Montgomery, Fishkill Correctional Facility S.H.U, Corrections Officer Barksdale, Nurse Shawna Healey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4555
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maum Meditation House of Truth et al v. Lake County
as 1:2013cv03794
Plaintiff:
Maum Meditation House of Truth and Sheeyung Sung
Defendant:
Lake County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darien Houser v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 12-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARIEN HOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
EDWARD CAMERON, ADA, COLLIN BURKE, ADA, BETH C. GROSSMAN, ADA and others
Kendall v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2012cv03438
Plaintiff:
Cyrill N. Kendall
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Brian Fischer, William J. Connolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maume Authority Stamping Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ricky R Smith and Kevin Rahrig
Defendant:
Maume Authority Stamping Inc and Keith S Obey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sia-Pao v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 1:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
Leopold Sia-Pao
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, WIlliam J. Connoly, Elizabeth Williams, J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
