Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Billiot v. Daniels et al
as 6:2026cv02832
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Billiot, Jr
Defendant:
Dewanna Stewart Daniels, Maggie Leblanc, Roger P Hamilton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration: Revocation of Citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00837
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00372
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Romero-Sosa v. Blanche
as 26-60610
Petitioner:
Yarelis Romero-Sosa
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04922
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Romero v. B&M #1 US Corp et al
as 1:2026cv06539
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Olivos Romero
Defendant:
Raj Paul, Medhat Shehata, B&M #1 US CORP doing business as TEXAS ROTISSERIE & GRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06152
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
