Cases 1 - 10 of 3,764
Rowe v. H & R Block
as 3:2024cv03403
Plaintiff:
Richard David Rowe, Jr.
Defendant:
H & R Block
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William L. Respess, Dean Barr, Hugh P. Brien and others
Defendant:
VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROWE-CLARK v. PITOFSKY et al
as 2:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
KAYESHAW ROWE-CLARK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER E PITOFSKY and R and K LOGISTICS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ewing v. Rowe et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Jordyn Rowe and Gold Medal Funding, LLC
Guevara v. Rowe
as 5:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Rogelio Guevara
Respondent:
Kelly S. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rowe v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Rowe
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Family Dollar Stores of Maryland, LLC and Dollar Tree, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rowe v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
David Rowe
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rowe v. Mo et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Richard David Rowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Mo and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company v. Rael Maintenance Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02680
Plaintiff:
Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company as subrogee of 25 Park Row Condominium, and all insureds under policy number KTQ-CMB-1T94741-7-22
Other:
Rael Maintenance Corp., Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc., Urban Atelier Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
