Cases 41 - 50 of 282
Barta v. Young et al
as 3:2019cv02462
Defendant:
Total Logistics, LLC, Joshua Dean Young and Total Logistics LLC
Plaintiff:
James Randolph Barta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Jaylen D. Jones, Kilven D. Cuba, Sgt. Bright O. Oluwolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Elliott Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. U.S. Air Force et al
as 5:2019cv01107
Defendant:
Department of Labor (Dallas, TX), Randolph AFB (San Antonio, TX), Department of Labor (Washington, DC) E.C.A.B. and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mach v. OneMain Financial Services, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00628
Plaintiff:
Randolph Mach
Defendant:
OneMain Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fearn v. Miller et al
as 3:2019cv01460
Defendant:
Keith Bruner, Sara Jane del Carmen, Beckie Paquin and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham Fearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2019cv00127
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv01239
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Plaintiff:
Randolph Morris
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Moghtader v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00632
Defendant:
Grievance Inspector J.I.E., Mark McPherson, Doctor Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Sina Moghtader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albarran v. Ba et al
as 4:2019cv00223
Plaintiff:
Nancy Edith Molina Albarran
Defendant:
Mamadou Ba, Randolph Miller d/b/a Eagle Wings Transportation and Randolph Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
