Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Michael Jones, Sarah Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Clervrain et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Scott Golden, Jennifer Little, Pat Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Laible et al v. Lanter et al
as 2:2021cv00102
Executor:
Jason Laible
Plaintiff:
Steven Klein and Maribeth Klein
Defendant:
Timothy Lanter, Brett Thomas, Donald Scalf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Griffin v. Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv00445
Defendant:
Mark Inch, W. Millette, K. McClay and others
Plaintiff:
Reggie Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HFR Precision Machining, Inc. v. Leon et al
as 1:2021cv01858
Defendant:
Angela Leon, Daisy Scalf, Susana Leon and others
Plaintiff:
HFR Precision Machining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SCALF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11087
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCALF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scalf v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Stephanie A Scalf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SCALF v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18822
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
YANET SCALF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunagan v. Lehnus et al
as 4:2020cv00393
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Dunagan
Defendant:
Michelle Lehnus, Michael S Scalf and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
