Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Arkansas United, et al v. John Thurston, et al
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellee: Arkansas United and L. Mireya Reith
Defendant / Appellant: John Thurston, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State of Arkansas, Sharon Brooks, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners, Bilenda Harris-Ritter, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and others
Defendant: Remee Oelschlaeger, in her official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Bill Ackerman, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Max Deitchler, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission and others
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Arkansas United, et al v. John Thurston, et al
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellee: Arkansas United and L. Mireya Reith
Defendant / Appellant: John Thurston, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State of Arkansas, Sharon Brooks, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners, Bilenda Harris-Ritter, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and others
Defendant: Remee Oelschlaeger, in her official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Bill Ackerman, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Max Deitchler, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission and others
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Arkansas United et al v. Thurston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv05193
Defendant: Bilenda Harris-Ritter, Renee Oelschlaeger, John Thurston and others
Plaintiff: Mireya Reith, Arkansas United and L. Mireya Reith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wince et al v. Thurston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01278
Defendant: Bilenda Harris-Ritter, William Luther, John Thurston and others
Plaintiff: Marquisa Wince and Mary Cantwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wince et al v. Thurston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01274
Defendant: Bilenda Harris-Ritter, William Luther, John Thurston and others
Plaintiff: Marquisa Wince and Mary Cantwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
League of Women Voters of Arkansas et al v. Thurston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv05174
Defendant: Bilenda Harris-Ritter, John Thurston, Charles Roberts and others
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of Arkansas, Robert William Allen, John McNee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 3:2020cv00768
Plaintiff: Shirley Brown, Sarah Lahti, Nancy Lea Wilde and others
Defendant: Thomas Cane, Mark L. Thomsen, Beverly R Gill and others
Amicus Curiae: United States Justice Foundation, Matthew Augustine, Erin M Decker and others
Intervenor Defendant: The Wisconsin Legislature
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruthelle Frank, et al v. Scott Walker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUTHELLE FRANK, JUSTIN LUFT, DARTRIC DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTT WALKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, THOMAS BARLAND, GERALD NICHOL and others
Ruthelle Frank, et al v. Scott Walker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3003
Plaintiff - Appellee: RUTHELLE FRANK, JUSTIN LUFT, DARTRIC DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant: SCOTT WALKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, MARK L. THOMSEN, ANN S. JACOBS and others
Moton et al v. Clarksdale, Mississippi
as 4:2015cv00049
Plaintiff: Mary Moton , Golden Sharpe , Jimmy Wiley and others
Defendant: Clarksdale, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?