Cases 1 - 10 of 605
Havens v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Heather Pearson, Vanmetter, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragosa-Solis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02901
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Smathers et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kevin Joseph Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Alexandra Kathleen Smathers, Xavier Solis and Gerad Dougvidlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galindo v. Dawson County et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ray Galindo
Defendant:
Dawson County and FNU Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinsory et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinsory, Elmer Moreno, Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragosa-Solis v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Solis-Antonio #319955 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
German Solis-Antonio
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. Warden FPC La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Eduardo Alejandro Solis
Respondent:
Warden FPC La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
