Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott Frakes, et al
as 21-3679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Frakes, (Current Director) - In thier Individual Capacity, Michelle Wilhelm, (Current Warden) - In their Individual Capacity, The State of Nebraska and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shakur v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Abdur-Rashid Shakur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rouse v. Kiriko et al
as 3:2021cv05386
Plaintiff:
Calvin N Rouse and Abdur Rashid Khalif
Defendant:
Shane R Ririe, Ben Fultz, Kiriko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Frakes et al
as 4:2021cv03096
Defendant:
The State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and Michele Wilhelm
Plaintiff:
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdur Rashid v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60922
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ABDUR RASHID
Rashid v. Abdulla Sweets and Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00743
Plaintiff:
Abdur Rashid
Defendant:
Rahana Y Moni, Abdulla Sweets and Restaurant, Inc. and Sultan Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rashid v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03902
Plaintiff:
Abdur Rashid
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Cruz et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2014cv09220
Plaintiff:
Rozana Mandelberg, Raphael Oliver, Maria Luz Almonte and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
