Cases 1 - 10 of 492
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
as 1:2024cv00165
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Bishop v. Local 52, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, Its Territories, and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC et al
as 1:2024cv06148
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronald Bishop
Defendant:
APPLE STUDIOS, INC., Universal Television, LLC, HBO STUDIOS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC v. Kellanova
as 1:2024cv00489
Defendant:
Kellanova and Kellogg Company
Plaintiff:
Local No. 70 Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
as 2:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC and United Steelworkers Local 244M
Defendant:
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Ameron Pole Products LLC
as 2:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Ameron Pole Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (Newport News Shipbuilding Division)
as 4:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Respondent:
Ingalls Inc., Newport News Shipbuilding Division and Huntingtion Ingalls Inc., Newport News Shipbuilding Division
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Swift & Staley Inc.
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Swift & Staley Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Michael Walden v. General Electric International, Inc., et al
as 24-5141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WALDEN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., aka General Electric, aka General Electric Aviation and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, CLC
Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. Rubottom et al
as 9:2024cv80073
Plaintiff:
Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC, Dylan R. Owens and Mark A. Warme
Defendant:
Chair of the Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, Palm Beach County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SeAH Steel VINA Corporation v. United States
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
SeAH Steel VINA Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Bull Moose Tube Company, Maruichi American Corporation, The United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
