Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HENRY et al v. JOHN DOE 1-Z et al
as 2:2023cv12317
Plaintiff:
RON HENRY, III and RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-Z, AGENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AGENTS OF UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON v. JOHN DOE 1-Z et al
as 2:2023cv05259
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-Z, AGENTS OF UNITED STATES and AGENTS OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daol Rexmark Union Station LLC et al v. Union Station Sole Member, LLC
as 1:2022cv06649
Plaintiff:
Daol Rexmark Union Station LLC and Kookmin Bank Co., Ltd. in its capacity as trustee of KTB CRE Debt Fund No. 8, a Korean Investment Trust, by its agent in Korea Daol Fund Management Co. and by its agent in United States Rexmark Holdings LLC d/b/a Rexmark
Defendant:
Union Station Sole Member, LLC
Petitioner:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kookmin Bank Co., Ltd v. Ashkenazy
as 1:2022cv05802
Plaintiff:
Kookmin Bank Co., Ltd in its capacity as trustee of KTB CRE Debt Fund No. 8, a Korean Investment Trust, by its agent in Korea Daol Fund Management Co. and by its, agent in United States, Rexmark Holdings LLC d/b/a Rexmark
Defendant:
Ben Ashkenazy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Alishaev Brothers AY Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Defendant:
Neil Cohen, United States Customs and Border Protection, Unnamed Agents of United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff:
Alishaev Brothers AY Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
McDaniel-Ivey v. Unknown Agents of United States et al
as 9:2021cv80006
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel-Ivey
Defendant:
United States and Unknown Agents of United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Birkos v. Sykes
as 1:2020cv05325
Plaintiff:
Roksana Birkos
Defendant:
Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service d/b/a USPS Postal Service d/b/a USPS d/b/a Postal Service, Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service and United States Postal Service individually doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loushonda Myers v. Steve Bizzell
as 16-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, In Propria Persona Plaintiff, Private Attorney General, on behalf of Dameon Myers and Tyre Myers, In Propria Persona Plaintiffs
Plaintiff:
C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child, M.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF STEVE BIZZELL, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office, CAPTAIN A.C. FISH, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office, DETECTIVE C.K. ALLEN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
Loushonda Myers v. AT&T Corporation
as 13-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, CM, a minor child, AM, a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATION, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF AT&T CORPORATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
13 United States Postal Service All Purpose Containers containing many thousands of foreign letters previously seized by agents of United States Customs and Border Protection
as 2:2011mj00836
Defendant:
13 United States Postal Service All Purpose Containers containing many thousands of foreign letters previously seized by agents of United States Customs and Border Protection (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
