Cases 1 - 7 of 7
McVay v. Akron Brass Company
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jill McVay
Defendant:
Akron Brass Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Dennis A. Rockwell et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv03963
Defendant:
ViacomCBS Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Warren Pumps, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rockwell and Dennis A Rockwell
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
XSCAPEEZ LTD v. AKRON BRASS COMPANY
as 1:2012cv01581
Defendant:
AKRON BRASS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
XSCAPEEZ LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Blumhorst v. Pierce Manufacturing Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Ervin E Blumhorst
Defendant:
Pierce Manufacturing Inc. and Akron Brass Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PALKO et al v. AKRON BRASS COMPANY
as 1:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PALKO and JENNIFER PALKO
Defendant:
AKRON BRASS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chambers et al v. Premier Farnell Corporation
as 1:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
Donald Chambers
Defendant:
Premier Farnell Corporation and Akron Brass Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
