Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Evans v. Current Medical Supervisor et al
as 4:2026cv02694
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Evans
Defendant:
Current Medical Supervisor and Ms Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(HC) Mitchell v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv03411
Petitioner:
Albert Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Albert Lee Jones v. D. Patton et al
as 5:2025cv02912
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Jones
Defendant:
D. Patton, C. Davis, Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acord et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11403
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc., Mine Respirator Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Leif Acord, Akil Kareem Akbar, Richard Denon Albritton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 25-3383
Petitioner:
ALBERT LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
WARDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Griner v. Dudek
as 3:2025cv00157
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Griner
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
ANDREWS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2025cv00162
Petitioner:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PSA Airlines Inc v. Hall
as 3:2024cv02373
Defendant:
Albert Lee Hall
Plaintiff:
PSA Airlines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
