Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Bey v. Arkansas State Police et al
as 4:2024cv00746
Defendant:
Jackson Shumate and Arkansas State Police
Plaintiff:
Ali Ali Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bey v. Midwest City City of et al
as 5:2024cv00828
Defendant:
Vicki Floyd, Brodie Bolen, David Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Ali Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Blossoms at West Dixon Rehab and Nursing Center
as 4:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Ali Ali Bey
Defendant:
Blossoms at West Dixon Rehab and Nursing Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
IN RE: KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY
as 2:2024cv02102
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY, DR. EUGUNE DONALD GOODWIN and DR. EUGENE DONALD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Szabad et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Ali Ali Bey
Defendant:
Richard Szabad, Bryant Police Department and Tre Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Quinn Bass v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Quinn Bass W.O.P. libellant doing business as Q Ali Bey Express Trust
Defendant:
CA Governor Gavin Newsom, State of California, County of San Bernardino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn Bass v. CA Governor Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Quinn Bass beneficial owner and grantor for Q Ali Bey Express Trust doing business as (Quinn Shinda Bass W.O.P.) Copyright TM
Defendant:
CA Governor Gavin Newsom, State of California, County of San Bernardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
