Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Muhammad et al v. Waggoner et al
as 2:2026cv00292
Plaintiff:
William Muhammad and Brenda Lewis
Defendant:
Jabo Waggoner, Robert Bentley, Dan Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan Armstrong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10603
Petitioner:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Peter Thompson v. Gregg Sullivan, et al
as 21-35528
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA RUMMEL, RANDY SULLIVAN, MARK CARPENTER, City of Bozeman, Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER THOMPSON
Armstrong v. Bludworth, et al
as 6:2021cv00026
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Pete Bludworth
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Lewis and Clark County
as 6:2020cv00088
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Armstrong
Respondent:
Lewis and Clark County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Louisiana
as 3:2020cv01422
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Allen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2020cv00077
Defendant:
J BROWN, MARK S INCH, K JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Morgan Armstrong
as 20-10815
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Thompson v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2018cv00075
Defendant:
Cattail Creek Community Association(s) of Phase I, II and III & of the Combined Covenant Association, Daniel S. Madison, Amanda Menasco and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan Armstrong v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 17-12152
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
