Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WOLF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22169
Plaintiff:
ALLEN WOLF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13803
Plaintiff:
LANE ALLEN WOLFE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Virgil Wolfe
as 20-30121
Defendant / Appellant:
VIRGIL ALLEN WOLFE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WOLF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03291
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ALLEN WOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARIS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03136
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARSHALL, BOBBY MARTIN, DAVID CALDWELL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aris et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02106
Plaintiff:
Michael Marshall, Bobby Martin, David Caldwell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Moore et al v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona et al
as 3:2018cv08152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore, Brian Allen Wolf and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. USA
as 3:2016cv01220
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wolfe v. Sonoma County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2012cv01340
Plaintiff:
Bradley Allen Wolfe
Defendant:
Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Steve Freitas and County of Sonoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02939
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Wolfe , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
