Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sposato v. Ryan
as 24-536
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPOSATO
Defendant:
MATTHEW W. RYAN, individually and in his official capacity, PAUL G. CAREY, -, individually and in his official capacity, JED HUDSON, individually and in his official capacity and others
Williams II v. County of Onondaga
as 23-891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Onondaga, County Attorney, City of Syracuse, City Attorney, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office, District Attorney's Office and others
Sposato v. Carey et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Richard Sposato
Defendant:
Paul G. Carey, Jed Hudson, John Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams II v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Williams II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, City of Syracuse, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66646
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Kristal Cadillac et al
as 1:2009cv03040
Plaintiff:
Alphonse Williams
Defendant:
Kristal Cadillac, Wrenroy Smith, Lilaahar (Sammy) Bical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
