Cases 1 - 10 of 235
Alvarenga v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv02989
Plaintiff:
Patricia Alvarenga
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Alvarenga Portillo v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Sandra G Alvarenga Portillo
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alvarenga-Henriquez v. Garland
as 24-735
Petitioner:
FLOR GRISELDA ALVARENGA-HENRIQUEZ and DIEGO ALEXIS ORTIZ-ALAVARENGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALVARENGA v. 2815 M ST, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALVARENGA and MIGUEL ALVARENGA
Defendant:
2815 M ST, LLC doing business as VILLA YARA, RAMZI ADNAN ISKANDAR and MAJED M. SAADI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alvarenga Vides v. Garland
as 24-301
Petitioner:
PATRICIA E ALVARENGA VIDES and JOSE JILBER GONZALEZ ALVARENGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Servellon-Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-390
Petitioner:
LORENA SERVELLON-HERNANDEZ and KENIA ALVARENGA-SERVELLON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sultana Ailena Vargas Bey v. San Bernardino County et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sultana Ailena Vargas Bey
Defendant:
San Bernardino County, Luther Snoke, Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Alvarenga
as 23-2199
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR ALVARENGA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
