Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WANG v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2020cv01952
Defendant:
WILEY PERIODICALS, INC., UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS, MARK GLADWIN and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 er
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Reese v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07940
Plaintiff:
Renee Reese
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc. , American Heart Association, Inc. and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Foundation L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0034
American Beverage Assn., et al v. City & County of San Francisco
as 16-16072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION and CALIFORNIA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA STATE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL ADVERTISERS, INC., CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
