Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Tate v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03237
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff: Amos Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tate v. Department of Corrections
as 9:2020cv82260
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Christopher Amos Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TATE v. BIANCHI
as 1:2020cv00311
Defendant: JASON BIANCHI, SCOTT and PHIL
Plaintiff: AMOS TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos Tate v. Schember, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3026
Defendant / Appellee: ERIE POLICE TRAFFIC DIVISION CAPTAIN, MAYOR SCHEMBER, ERIE PA SOLICITOR BETZA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMOS TATE
Defendant: OWNERS OF MCMILLAN TOWING
TATE v. MAYOR SCHEMBER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00179
Defendant: MAYOR SCHEMBER, ERIE POLICE TRAFFIC DIVISION CAPTAIN, OWNERS OF MCMILLAN TOWING and others
Plaintiff: AMOS TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. HUD WASHINGTON DC AND HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00318
Plaintiff: AMOS TATE
Defendant: STAIRWAYS, HUD WASHINGTON DC AND HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT and JEN DRESWICKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. JFK Medical Center, North Campus et al
as 9:2017cv81195
Plaintiff: Christopher Amos Tate
Defendant: JFK Medical Center, North Campus and Bernard Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Christopher Tate
as 16-15986
Petitioner: In re: CHRISTOPHER AMOS TATE
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Tate v. SCI Benner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01108
Plaintiff: Amos Tate
Defendant: SCI Benner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v SCI BENNER, et al
as 1:2016cv00022
Petitioner: AMOS TATE
Respondent: SCI BENNER and FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?