Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jenkins v. Ampco System Parking, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00756
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Jenkins
Defendant:
Ampco System Parking, Inc. and Teamsters Local 618, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Alvarez v. Ampco System Parking, Inc.
as 1:2013cv22046
Plaintiff:
Carlos I. Alvarez
Defendant:
Ampco System Parking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
DOWNEY v. ABM INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06705
Plaintiff:
PHILIP DOWNEY
Defendant:
ABM INDUSTRIES, INC., AMPCO SYSTEM PARKING, INC., AMPCO PACIFIC AIRPARK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FIELDEN v. MACQUARIE OFFICE MONUMENT CENTER I, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00288
Defendant:
AMPCO SYSTEM PARKING, INC., JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC., MACQUARIE OFFICE MONUMENT CENTER I, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY FIELDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Chico v. Ampco System Parking, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv20453
Plaintiff:
Freddy A. Chico
Defendant:
Ampco System Parking, Inc. and Manrique Orellana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ampco System Parking, Inc. v. Fulton Place Parking, L.L.C.
as 2:2011cv01491
Defendant:
Fulton Place Parking, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Ampco System Parking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Kelib v. AMPCO System Parking, Inc, et al
as 0:2011cv01174
Plaintiff:
Robel Kelib
Defendant:
AMPCO System Parking, Inc, and Teamsters Local 120
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Blanco v. Ampco System Parking, Inc.
as 8:2010cv01817
Plaintiff:
Valerie Blanco
Defendant:
Ampco System Parking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAMS v. AMPCO SYSTEM PARKING, INC.
as 3:2010cv01277
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AMPCO SYSTEM PARKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Teamsters Local 665 v. AMPCO System Parking, Inc.
as 5:2009cv02430
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 665
Defendant:
AMPCO System Parking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
