Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke and D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leal v. City Of Laredo et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
David Leal, II
Defendant:
City Of Laredo, James Cantu, Jacqueline Davalos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Rodriguez v. State of Florida
as 23-13830
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ANDRES RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
United States of America v. Santana (Brooks)
as 23-7788
Defendant:
ELVIS SANTANA, DANNY BUENO, ANGEL DELACRUZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAUN BROOKS
USA v. Rodriguez-Cornejo
as 23-50532
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Andres Rodriguez-Cornejo, also known as Aguate
US v. Rodriguez-Cortez
as 23-1377
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM ANDRES RODRIGUEZ-CORTEZ, a/k/a Mario Alejandro Jimenez-Borca
Rodriguez v. DOWCP
as 23-60198
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Lozoya et al v. West Texas Boring LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Alex Lozoya, Eric Lozoya, Andres Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
West Texas Boring LLC, Craig Morse, Mark Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Judith Rodriguez et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2022cv02581
Plaintiff:
Judith Rodriguez, Andres Rodriguez_Salgado and Andres Rodriguez Salgado
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62962
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ANDRES RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
