Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01393
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Foreman v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 6:2025cv00460
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Banfield Foreman
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and Andres Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Foreman v. Bank of America, N. A. et al
as 6:2025cv00280
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Banfield Foreman
Defendant:
Bank of America, N. A. and Andres Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ORTIZ-ORDONEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 3:2024cv11519
Petitioner:
ANDRES ORTIZ-ORDONEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv02005
Plaintiff:
Miguel Andres Ortiz
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Ortiz-Chusino v. Garland
as 24-27
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN ALEXANDER ORTIZ-CHUSINO, KERLY ABIGAIL ORTIZ-SIGUENZA, ANN GABRIELA SIGUENZA-QUITO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz v. Qoreli1 LLC
as 1:2023cv07967
Plaintiff:
Andres Ortiz
Defendant:
Qoreli1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARTEAGA et al v. CARILLO
as 4:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Luiber Arteaga, Nelly Carolina Colmenares, Luis David Ordonez Avendano and others
Defendant:
Aron Carillo doing business as 3Carrillo's Construction and 3Carrillos LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
