Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GAMBILL v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PIERCE COUNTY WA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sovereign Freeman, Sovereignty Joeseph v. Kastens et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Sovereignty Joeseph Helmueller Sovereign Freeman and Andrew Jacob Helmueller
Defendant:
Officer Kastens, Officer Behnke, Unknown Doe Officer and others
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Fantel v. Brutinel et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Robert Brutinel, Pamela Sue Frasher Gates, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADELMAN et al v. JACOBS et al
as 2:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ADELMAN and JENNIFER ADELMAN
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS , TODD MODENA , BRIAN MARKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-587
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-318
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-313
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
