Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Hawaii Paroling Authority, et al
as 19-17321
Defendant / Appellee:
NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL, CLAYTON H.W. HEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Grandinetti v. Hawaii Paroling Authority (HPA) et al
as 1:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti and Francis Anthony Grandinetti
Defendant:
Jesse Macadamia, Annelle C. Amaral, Governor and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Nichols et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Sheriff Travis Patten and Jail Administrator Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEM FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC et al v. PFANSTIEL et al
as 2:2019cv00490
Defendant:
NICHOLAS POCHIBA, KAYLA CONTI, OLIVIA STOPKO and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCKENNA, MCKENNA DISTRICT OFFICE, LLC and KEM FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile
as 19-6058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE ANDREW MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
USA v. Andrew Weathers
as 19-50256
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW MORGAN WEATHERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morgan v. Nichols et al
as 5:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Travis Patten and Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Patten et al
as 5:2018cv00131
Defendant:
Travis Patten and Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2017cv00622
Plaintiff:
George Andrew Morgan
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 6:2015cv03230
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
