Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROACH v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANDREW ROACH, JR
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. doing business as WEPAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
ROACH v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv05011
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANDREW ROACH, JR
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. doing business as WEPAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33713
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52266
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Roach v. Motorola Mobility, LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv00988
Plaintiff:
Andrew Roach
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility, LLC and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avaya Inc. v. Pearce et al
as 3:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Telephone Man of America LLC, The Telecom Spot, Atlas Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Avaya Inc.
Special Master:
Elizabeth D. Laporte
Cross Claimant:
Tri-State Communication Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
SHAFFER et al v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2017cv01537
Defendant:
JASON BURTON, CITY OF KOKOMO, TERESA GALLOWAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROACH and BRANDON SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster et al v. Seattle Housing Authority et al
as 2:2011cv02103
Defendant:
Seattle Housing Authority , Andrew Roach and Shurvon Wright
Plaintiff:
Jerome Foster , Samuel Jefferson and Charles Bahati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Botetourt County School Board et al
as 7:2010cv00378
Defendant:
Botetourt County School Board, Judith Gross, Larry R. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
