Cases 41 - 50 of 337
Blythe et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
Calvin Blythe, Jerry Auffet, Conrad Stutzman and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodriguez v. Boston Public Schools, et al
as 22-1217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT and SHAUN O. HARRISON, individually and in his official capacity
USA v. Rodriguez
as 22-10224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Angel Rodriguez, also known as Casper, also known as trappaholic 1 k
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00459
Petitioner:
Alvaro Angel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
