Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Fukuda v. Chang et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Defendant:
Sonia Nakada, Justice Gary W. B. Chang, Former Justice Patrick Border and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Fukuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Keith Allen, et al v. DC
as 21-7142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Allen, Wanda Gertrude Allen, Keith Dominick Allen, a minor by his mother and next friend; in her own behalf and as next friend K.D.A., Lashell Laura Gaskins, in her own behalf and as next friend of T.D.G. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47255
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DANIELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Smith
as 1:2021cv01651
Defendant:
No Named Defendant and Kim Smith
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Daniel v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY DANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Corrections
Anthony Daniele v. United States
as 20-2977
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Daniele
Daniel v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72990
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DANIEL MOLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELE v. WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE et al
as 1:2020cv08779
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniele
Defendant:
John Doe, Walgreens Boots Alliance, PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Walker v. Shane Jackson
as 20-1383
Respondent / Appellee:
SHANE JACKSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY DANIEL WALKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
