Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jones v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Jeff Bezos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv01969
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Office of Secretary of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Francois v. Kashner et al
as 1:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Markell Francois
Defendant:
Thomas Dillon Kashner and Ryan Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Anthony Jones
as 22-2064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JONES
JONES v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SGT. MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. VIVE HEALTH, LLC
as 2:2021cv01125
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
VIVE HEALTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
USA v. Anthony Jones
as 20-2400
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JONES, aka EARS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv01020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EAVES v. CHESTER et al
as 2:2019cv00485
Defendant:
SIR CHRISTOPHER H. CHESTER, SIR ANDREW CHARLES BAILEY, NONSTOP COURIERS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRYANT EAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
