Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Moore v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections and The Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanyard v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Stanyard
Defendant:
Sheriff, Brevard County, Sergeant Mario Soto, Anthony Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion)
as 5:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
John Anthony Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Warden Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02055
Petitioner:
Timothy Anthony Moore
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Warden Scarantino
as 3:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Timothy Anthony Moore
Respondent:
USA and Warden Scarantino
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boyd et al v TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Andre D Boyd, Norris Hicks, Dennis Mayes and others
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Potosi Correctional Center et al
as 4:2021cv00584
Defendant:
Potosi Correctional Center, Ashley Skaggs, R. Since and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv02777
Defendant:
A. Smith, K. Striblin, D. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Moore
Petitioner:
Mark A Munoz, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Inch
as 0:2020cv61488
Defendant:
Mark Inch
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01723
Petitioner:
Vernon Anthony Moore
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
