Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ellis Jr. et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04366
Plaintiff:
Robert Ellis Jr., LaTricia Anderson-Thompson, Curtis Richards and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Butler Jr. et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04294
Plaintiff:
Cordell Butler Jr., Demika Thomas-Hill, Ray Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. MDOC WCCF et al
as 5:2026cv00438
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davis
Defendant:
MDOC WCCF, M. Cates and Mr. Delaney
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00864
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Adams et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12061
Plaintiff:
David Adams, Genese Alindor, Debra Allen and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11861
Plaintiff:
Megan Adams, Michael Aguado, Patrick Ahearn and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis #369621 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2025cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ricky Antonio Davis #369621, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Bennett, Unknown Baker, Unknown Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
