Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
Jones v. Odum
as 1:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. ODUM
as 5:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26322
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Shakhpandarov et al
as 2:2023cv10765
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jones
Defendant:
Balabek Shakhpandarov, Star Line LLC, Farmers Insurance Exchange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. Stephens
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Stephens
as 9:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antonio Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Antonio Jones v. Arthur Degrave, et al
as 22-2123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR DEGRAVE and MARSHA GLEASON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
