Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Thompson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02922
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Thompson and April Thompson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarado v. White et al
as 4:2015cv00772
Plaintiff:
Jorge Antonio Alvarado
Defendant:
Joni White, James Sloan and April Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarado v. White et al
as 6:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jorge Antonio Alvarado
Defendant:
Joni White, James Sloan and April Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Triumph Aerostructures LLC.
as 2:2013cv14039
Plaintiff:
April Thompson
Defendant:
Triumph Aerostructures LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Todd Luh v. Corey Farnsworth, et al
as 12-3422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey f Farnsworth, Brigette Rose, Tyler Chavez and others
Johnson v. Thaler et al
as 9:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Johnson
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Oliver Bell, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 10-2539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Fillmore v. City of Osage City, Kansas et al
as 5:2009cv04102
Plaintiff:
Rodney Joe Fillmore
Defendant:
City of Osage City, Kansas, Larry J. Phillips, Robert T. Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 09-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Luh v. Missouri, State of et al
as 5:2008cv06088
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Mary Attebury, James Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
