Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Jeffery Johnson v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 24-5198
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON, aka Anthony Cain
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, MARTHA DILMAGHANI, JOHN DOE #1, Aramark Dietician and others
Janous v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Janous
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Williams
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Duncan Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Williams
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Duncan Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Mick et al
as 2:2022cv03492
Plaintiff:
John A Boyd
Defendant:
Kimberly Mick and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Leach
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Marion Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Martha Dilmaghani, Warden Anna Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Anderson v. Aramark Corr Srvs
as 21-3838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, aka Aramark Corporation
Kendrick v. Erdos et al
as 2:2021cv00983
Defendant:
Institutional Insp Linnea Mahlman, Health Care Admin Goodwin, Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
