Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Flores et al v. US Bank National Association
as 7:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Armando Flores and Veronica Herrera
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oscar Flores-De Paz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70316
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARMANDO FLORES-DE PAZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Julio Armando Flores Madera
as 8:2012mj00016
Defendant:
Julio Armando Flores Madera (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Armando Flores-Herna v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72135
Petitioner:
ARMANDO FLORES-HERNA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Flores-Armenta v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00041
Petitioner:
Armando Flores-Armenta
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aguilar et al v. BP Company North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04220
Plaintiff:
Felix C Aguilar , Roman L. Alonso , Richard A. Cabreles and others
Defendant:
BP Company North America, Inc. , BP Corporation North America, Inc. , BP America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
General Electric Capital Business Asset Funding Corporation of Connecticut et al v. C & S Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01381
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Business Asset Funding Corporation of Connecticut, GE Commercial Finance Business Property Corporation, CEF Funding L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
C & S Restaurant Group, Inc., CSE Restaurants, L.L.C., CSC Restaurant Group Ohio, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Flores et al
as 4:2009cv03730
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Armando Flores and Miguel Angel Madrid
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
Oscar Flores-De Paz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-72347
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARMANDO FLORES-DE PAZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
