Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cotugno v. The Boppy Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Italia Cotugugno and Italia Cotugno
Defendant:
The Bobby Company LLC, Artsana S.P.A. d/b/a Artsana Group, The Boppy Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wooten et al v. The Boppy Company, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
Zaleiph Wooten and Tawana Patina Reid
Defendant:
The Boppy Company, LLC, Walmart Inc. and Artsana S.P.A. doing business as Artsana Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LIMEUX et al v. THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
MERCEDES LIMEUX and ARYHOUN AKEEN SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC, ARTSANA USA, INC., CHICCO U.S.A., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Parker et al v. The Boppy Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Megan Parker and Sameko Parker
Defendant:
The Bobby Company, LLC, Artsana USA, Inc d/b/a Chicco, Artsana S.p.A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLARK et al v. THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE CLARK, DERRICK BRONSON and DANIELLE CLARK AND DERRICK BRONSON
Defendant:
THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC, ARTSANA U.S.A., INC. ARTSANA U.S.A., INC. D/B/A CHICCO, ARTSANA S.P.A. ARTSANA S.P.A. D/B/A ARTSANA GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WOOTEN v. THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
ZALEIPH WOOTEN and TAWANA PATINA REID
Defendant:
THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC, WALMART INC., ARTSANA U.S.A., INC. d/b/a CHICCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Artsana USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04863
Plaintiff:
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Artsana USA, Inc. and Artsana, S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
