Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Vazquez Romero v. La Morenita Fruit Market Corp et al
as 1:2023cv06300
Plaintiff:
Araceli Vazquez Romero
Defendant:
La Morenita Fruit Market Corp doing business as La Guadalupe Fruits & Vegetables, Gabino Arturo Ramos and Pamela Mejia Ramos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ramos v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Luis Arturo Ramos
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ESPANTA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11982
Plaintiff:
ARTURO RAMOS ESPANTA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arturo Ramos-Villeda v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3675
Petitioner:
ARTURO RAMOS-VILLEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arturo Ramos-Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71380
Petitioner:
ARTURO RAMOS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02217
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001
Arturo Ramos v. DLI Properties, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv01257
Plaintiff:
Arturo Ramos
Defendant:
DLI Properties, LLC, Recontrust Company Inc, Americas Wholesale Lender and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J & J Sports v. El Nopal Restaurant II, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00171
Defendant:
El Nopal Restaurant II, LLC, Rosario Munoz, Arturo Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
