Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Doss et al v. AT&T Inc.
as 4:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Doss, Bethany Miller and Aimee Jarvis
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Harris et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Rosalind D. Harris and Bettie J. Harris
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
David L. Jones
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
City of Jefferson, Missouri v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 4:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
City of Jefferson, Missouri
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, f/k/a Cingular Wireless, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hammonds et al v. Thind et al
as 2:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michele Hammonds
Defendant:
Khushdeep Singh Thind, 2320959 Ontario Inc doing business as JMD Express, Ronnie Hooper, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foley v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00635
Plaintiff:
Jack Foley
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc, AT&T Inc and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
Krawczyk v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv01399
Trustee:
John P. Vaclavek
Defendant:
AT&T Advertising, LP, AT&T Corp., YP Western Directory LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Krawczyk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
