Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Garner v. AutoZone Stores, Inc.
as 4:2022cv12380
Plaintiff:
Robert Garner
Defendant:
AutoZone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Underwood v. O-Reilly Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01766
Plaintiff:
Tyler Underwood
Defendant:
O-Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., Illinois Tool Works, Inc., The Blaster Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Depp v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Richard Depp
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watkins et al v. Hansford et al
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Huel Watkins and Susan Watkins
Defendant:
Brandon Hansford , AutoZone Stores, Inc. , AutoZone Stores LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. AutoZone Development Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv07308
Defendant:
AutoZone Development Corporation, Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary L Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Davis v. AutoZone Development Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv09495
Petitioner:
Mary L Davis
Respondent:
AutoZone Development Corporation , Autozone, Inc. and Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ulrich v. Autozone Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00087
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone Stores, LLC
Plaintiff:
James B Ulrich, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickinson v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00500
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and AutoZone Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melissa Dickinson
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Stout et al v. Autozone Stores Inc et al
as 0:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Stout and James A Stout
Defendant:
Autozone Stores Inc and AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baxter et al v. Autozone Stores Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01285
Plaintiff:
Misty Baxter
Defendant:
Autozone Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
