Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Robey et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 5:2018cv00190
Defendant:
Brock and Scott, PLLC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Aaron Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Robey and Daniel Robey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Manna et al v. Cribari et al
as 1:2018cv02539
Plaintiff:
Paulie Vincent Manna and Elizabeth Manna
Defendant:
James Bertolas, Austin Crowley, Aaron Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Paloranta et al
as 1:2018cv01338
Plaintiff:
Chayce Aaron Anderson
Defendant:
Deana (I) Paloranta and Deana Paloranta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robey et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 1:2018cv21033
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robey and Pamela Robey
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC., Brock and Scott, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Anderson v. Boxberger et al
as 1:2017cv00884
Plaintiff:
Chayce Aaron Anderson
Defendant:
Cara Boxberger, Jason Shutters and Mark Delano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTTON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIDUCIARY TRUSTEE et al
as 1:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
DAVID-WILLIAM COTTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIDUCIARY TRUSTEE, STEPHANIE REAMS, ARCHIE L. SMITH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Brew City Bar B Q Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01244
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Brew City Bar B Q Inc, John Whitehead , Aaron Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Joshua Anderson
as 16-1053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA AARON ANDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
