Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Conde v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv08506
Plaintiff:
Nouhou Conde
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Jamal M. Abdus-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Abdus-Sabur et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12280
Plaintiff:
WALI ABDUS-SABUR, Dominick Pilotti, Jose Baquero and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
FAKHIR v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06888
Plaintiff:
ABDUS SABUR FAKHIR
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUS-SABUR v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
JASON ABDUS-SABUR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA , HOPE VILLAGE, INC. and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02264
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02263
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Muhammad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 3:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Abdus-Sabur Muhammad
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Abdus-Sabur Queen v. James Cro
as 11-6010
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABDUS-SABUR IBN QUEEN, a/k/a Samuel Robert Queen, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES N. CROSS
In re: Abdus-Sabur Queen
as 11-1000
Petitioner:
In re: ABDUS-SABUR IBN QUEEN, f/k/a Samuel Robert Queen, Jr.
:
THE BRITH SHOLOM FOUNDATION et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
THE BRITH SHOLOM FOUNDATION , LUCINDA MCBURNETTE and ABDUS SABUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
