Cases 31 - 40 of 990
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Noble v. Napier
as 23-1994
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Gebar Byrd v. Michele Buckner, et al
as 23-3640
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gebar Byrd
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, In her official capacity as acting warden of Potosi Correctional Center and Andrew Bailey, Attorney General of Missouri
Russell Fritz v. Misty Mackey
as 23-3974
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL J. FRITZ
Respondent / Appellee:
MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
Lundy v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lundy
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., A. Crain, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr. v. Stephen Smith
as 2:2023cv09999
Petitioner:
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr
Respondent:
Acting Warden Stephen Smith and Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miguel Flores Jr. v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2023cv09998
Petitioner:
Miguel Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Falcone v. McManus et al
as 4:2023cv01196
Petitioner:
Michael Falcone
Respondent:
Acting Warden McManus, Bureau of Prisons and Acting Warden M. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gama-Perez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00340
Petitioner:
Josue Gama-Perez
Respondent:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carl Mott v. Paul Schreiber
as 23-2012
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL W. MOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL SCHREIBER, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
