Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pedersen v. Pure Mechanical LLC
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Kristen Pedersen
Defendant:
Pure Mechanical LLC
Intervenor:
Acuity A Mutual Insurance Company
Harmon-Beckwith v. Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Harmon-Beckwith
Defendant:
Acuity Speciality Products, Inc. d/b/a Zep Inc., Acuity Specialty Products, Inc. doing business as Zep Inc. and Zep, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HELLER v. OPTIMAL ACUITY CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv20371
Plaintiff:
DONALD HELLER
Defendant:
OPTIMAL ACUITY CORPORATION, MICHAEL JAMES BERRY I and MICHAEL JAMES BERRY II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberts v. Acuity Professional Placement Solutions, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00828
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Roberts
Defendant:
Acuity Professional Placement Solutions, LLC , Robert McCauley and William Camp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barrera v. Acuity Hospital of South Texas, LLC
as 5:2017cv00165
Defendant:
Acuity Hospital of South Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pauline Barrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Benharris v. Zep, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11318
Defendant:
Zep, Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neil Benharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Garner v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Julie Garner
Defendant:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Thrasher v. Acuity Brands, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03410
Plaintiff:
Racquel Thrasher
Defendant:
Acuity Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Terrell et al v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
as 2:2015at00455
Plaintiff:
Johnny Terrell, Trekenna Terrell and Margie Terrell
Defendant:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Terrell, et al. v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
Johnny Terrell , Trekenna Terrell and Margie Terrell
Defendant:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
