Cases 31 - 40 of 12,500
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. City of Nashville, The et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
City of Nashville, The, State of Tennessee, The, Buddy Rhett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
Judge Megan Adams, A.G. James Betts, John Edinger, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laboy v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hector Laboy
Defendant:
Austin Adams, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Clark v. Adam Cruter, et al
as 24-5352
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CLARK
Defendant:
ADAM D. CRUTER, Officer, ERIC JACKSON, Officer, RHETT BUDDY, Officer and others
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02948
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Nyc Dept of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner:
Adam Dahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moultrie v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Counselor P. Adams and Major Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
