Cases 41 - 50 of 12,532
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Adams v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02603
Plaintiff:
Kent Adams
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Adam Casey v. Nancie Williams
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
ADAM NICHOLAS CASEY
Defendant:
NANCIE WILLIAMS, D.B.A. Judge "JDR" Warren County Court, Juvenile Domestic Relations and UNKNOWN, Individual at the Court Hearing Representing Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant:
Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Walker v. Wong et al
as 5:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker
Defendant:
Deputy Wong, Deputy Normaly Wortes, Dr. Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin White, Jr. v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1770
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GEORGE WHITE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS and MARCIA COMBINE
Faulkner v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Faulkner
Defendant:
The City Mayor Adams, Commissioner NYC Corrections, Deputy Commissioner NYC Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03153
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
