Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 5:2014cv04145
Plaintiff:
Rajan Nanavati
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Kayla Smith
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Judy Calhoun v. Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv04100
Plaintiff:
Judy Calhoun
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC, Does 1-50, inclusive and others
Not Classified By Court:
Randall Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
J. Robert Berrellez v. Rose International Inc et al
as 2:2014cv03163
Plaintiff:
J. Robert Berrellez
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Does 1-50 inclusive, Rose International Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
Randall Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Libel,Assault,Slander
Johnson v. Adecco USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02424
Plaintiff:
Melissa Johnson
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc. and ATC LOGISTICS TENNESSEE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
HAINES v. ADECCO USA, INC
as 1:2013cv00689
Defendant:
ADECCO USA, INC
Plaintiff:
PAULA K. HAINES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
THOMAS v. ADECCO USA INC
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY THOMAS
Defendant:
ADECCO USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Smiley et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 3:2012cv02380
Plaintiff:
Bobbi-Jo Smiley , Amber Blow and Kelsey Turner
Defendant:
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wvense D Amador Jr v. Celestica Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00771
Defendant:
Adecco USA Inc, Celestica Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Wvense D Amador, Jr
Martha Jensen v. Adecco USA Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00563
Defendant:
Adecco USA Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Martha Jensen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
