Cases 1 - 10 of 28
IBRAHIM v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC d/b/a LA FITNESS
as 6:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
AHMED IBRAHIM
Defendant:
FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC d/b/a LA FITNESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ibrahim v. Hard Rock Hotel and Casino
as 1:2023cv22467
Plaintiff:
Amr Ahmed Ibrahim
Defendant:
HARD ROCK HOTEL AND CASINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ibrahim v. Hard Rock Hotel and Casino
as 1:2023cv07971
Plaintiff:
Amr Ahmed Ibrahim
Defendant:
Hard Rock Hotel and Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Estate of Daniel L. Maher et al v. World Assembly of Muslim Youth et al
as 1:2023cv02845
Defendant:
Adel Batterjee, Armand Albert Freidrich Huber, World Assembly of Muslim Youth and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel L. Maher, Katherine Maher, Daniel R. Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Cazares v. Beety Market Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Cazares
Defendant:
Beety Market Inc. and Ahmed Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jarrell et al v. Haaji et al
as 5:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lynn Jarrell, Linda Jarrell and Dustin Chance
Defendant:
Ahmed Ibrahim Haaji, U.S. Roadways Enterprises Inc and CSAA General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ahmed Ibrahim v. Target Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Ibrahim
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation, Target Corporation and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mahmoud Ibrahim v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1962
Petitioner:
MAHMOUD MOHAMED AHMED IBRAHIM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ibrahim v. Aezah
as 3:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Ibrahim
Defendant:
Rafeek Aezah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Isse v. White
as 1:2020cv05299
Petitioner:
Ahmed Ibrahim Isse
Respondent:
Warden Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
